<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Juliet&#8217;s All-Natural Acne Solution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.topacneproducts.org/juliets-all-natural-acne-solution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.topacneproducts.org/juliets-all-natural-acne-solution/</link>
	<description>an acne treatment critic reveals all</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:51:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Candler</title>
		<link>http://www.topacneproducts.org/juliets-all-natural-acne-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Candler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topacneproducts.org/?p=298#comment-247</guid>
		<description>Your credibility, at least in my eyes, is more than seriously damaged by your quite damning and inaccurate description of the Juliet&#039;s web site.  I visited the website on e-bay and found it to be very thorough and descriptive in terms of the ingredients of their products.  It left little doubt as to the reason for each ingredient&#039;s incorporation into their formulas.  Some cross-referencing, via extensive web searches, validated the potential effects of most ingredients and of what was related on the web page.  While the site is a little &quot;glitzy&quot; and does consist of one very long page, all the needed info is there, including incredible numbers of testimonials.

Beyond that, did your &quot;critic&quot; care that the products work.  I have been &quot;afflicted&quot; with a fairly rare type of senior acne.  While it does not manifest itself as harshly as adolescent acne, it is nonetheless a problem that 3 different dermatologists have not been able to improve...not cure...improve.  Within 4 days of my initial use of Juliet&#039;s Scrub, I could see a distinct difference in my skin.  Particularly bad spots were dried up very quickly using the Acne Gel.  And the Facial Cleanser!  Wow!  Never has my face felt cleaner.  I follow up each scrub with the cleanser.  By the way, when one uses Juliet&#039;s Facial Cleanser, it does not &quot;muddy&quot; the bath water like ALL SOAPS DO!...another sign of it being cleaner, healthier product to use on one&#039;s face.

I think it is sad that your &quot;critic&quot; saw fit to forward such an unwarranted, very skeptical and very negative opinion.  It is sadder yet that you would publich it without a little further investigation. Your &quot;critic&quot; also seemed quite biased toward having a business web site solely on e-bay.  E-bay is the world&#039;s largest retailer with millions of hits every day.  Is that the problem?  They&#039;re too big?  Well, they EARN their money, while your &quot;critic&quot;...and you... provide a disservice to American readers.

Your &quot;critic&quot; is obviously one of the many millions of &quot;1/2 empty&quot; folks that pervade American non-profit organizations these days. Bureaucrats with a little power over someone else, someone else that, for all practical purposes, cannot retaliate; and personal biases that affect their every word, their every action. To compound the &quot;critic&#039;s&quot; ineffectiveness and biases, management  &quot;circles the wagons&quot; in self-defense of its own little organization, and allows the behavior to continue...and, in doing so, they actually SUPPORT &amp; REINFORCE the negative behavior.

You could be a good web site, but you got to clean up your act first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your credibility, at least in my eyes, is more than seriously damaged by your quite damning and inaccurate description of the Juliet&#8217;s web site.  I visited the website on e-bay and found it to be very thorough and descriptive in terms of the ingredients of their products.  It left little doubt as to the reason for each ingredient&#8217;s incorporation into their formulas.  Some cross-referencing, via extensive web searches, validated the potential effects of most ingredients and of what was related on the web page.  While the site is a little &#8220;glitzy&#8221; and does consist of one very long page, all the needed info is there, including incredible numbers of testimonials.</p>
<p>Beyond that, did your &#8220;critic&#8221; care that the products work.  I have been &#8220;afflicted&#8221; with a fairly rare type of senior acne.  While it does not manifest itself as harshly as adolescent acne, it is nonetheless a problem that 3 different dermatologists have not been able to improve&#8230;not cure&#8230;improve.  Within 4 days of my initial use of Juliet&#8217;s Scrub, I could see a distinct difference in my skin.  Particularly bad spots were dried up very quickly using the Acne Gel.  And the Facial Cleanser!  Wow!  Never has my face felt cleaner.  I follow up each scrub with the cleanser.  By the way, when one uses Juliet&#8217;s Facial Cleanser, it does not &#8220;muddy&#8221; the bath water like ALL SOAPS DO!&#8230;another sign of it being cleaner, healthier product to use on one&#8217;s face.</p>
<p>I think it is sad that your &#8220;critic&#8221; saw fit to forward such an unwarranted, very skeptical and very negative opinion.  It is sadder yet that you would publich it without a little further investigation. Your &#8220;critic&#8221; also seemed quite biased toward having a business web site solely on e-bay.  E-bay is the world&#8217;s largest retailer with millions of hits every day.  Is that the problem?  They&#8217;re too big?  Well, they EARN their money, while your &#8220;critic&#8221;&#8230;and you&#8230; provide a disservice to American readers.</p>
<p>Your &#8220;critic&#8221; is obviously one of the many millions of &#8220;1/2 empty&#8221; folks that pervade American non-profit organizations these days. Bureaucrats with a little power over someone else, someone else that, for all practical purposes, cannot retaliate; and personal biases that affect their every word, their every action. To compound the &#8220;critic&#8217;s&#8221; ineffectiveness and biases, management  &#8220;circles the wagons&#8221; in self-defense of its own little organization, and allows the behavior to continue&#8230;and, in doing so, they actually SUPPORT &amp; REINFORCE the negative behavior.</p>
<p>You could be a good web site, but you got to clean up your act first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
